Section Navigation
Essay
“One of the most important committees on which I served was the Smallpox Eradication Committee of the World Health Organization, to which I was appointed on the basis of the success of my vaccinia virus research program.
“...In the late '80s, [WHO] renewed efforts to destroy [all remaining smallpox] stocks. This did not seem smart to me for several reasons...Therefore, at the Ninth International Congress of Virology in Glasgow in 1993, I pointed out, in the course of opening a roundtable conference entitled ‘Smallpox: The final steps toward eradication,’ how shortsighted and self-destructive destruction of the officially sanctioned stocks of smallpox virus would be. I followed up this talk with three articles...[which] elicited a great deal of interest and a deluge of comments. The official United States position vacillated for several years until in the late '90s, U.S. officials decided (after urging by Britain) not to destroy smallpox virus stocks. The wisdom of this decision became apparent during the smallpox virus scare several years ago when the potency of smallpox virus vaccine stocks could be determined accurately.”
- Brilliant minds in Australia, Denmark, England, and the United States
- From “very small” to 33: Recruiting the department at Duke
- 1,260 pages of virology expertise, updated every four years
- The author plays devil's advocate for the eradication of smallpox
- Duke marches to the front lines on the “War on Cancer” with its new Comprehensive Cancer Center
- After a century, virology separates from microbiology
The views expressed within each of these essays are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Duke University School of Medicine or Duke University Health System.
